System assessment
Review code, versions, accounts, integrations and known issues. Distinguish confirmed findings from areas that need more investigation.
An older application may still be doing an important job. Before replacing it, we examine the code, dependencies and business workflow so you can choose what to maintain, improve or rebuild.
Discuss your project ↗
From the existing application to a plan you can test and roll back.
Review code, data, accounts and the people who know the workflow. Separate confirmed findings from unknowns.
Check backups and restore procedures. Prepare a test environment before changing what users depend on.
Agree reviewable increments, assess impact and identify who approves production changes.
Hand over documentation and procedures, with a clear boundary between maintenance and additional work.
For organizations with an application that still matters but has limited documentation, an outgoing supplier, aging dependencies or changes that are becoming difficult to release safely.
Review code, versions, accounts, integrations and known issues. Distinguish confirmed findings from areas that need more investigation.
Agree access, responsibilities, backup and restore checks, and a safe place to test changes before touching production.
Prioritize defects and dependency upgrades. Break modernization into changes that can be reviewed and accepted.
Prepare runbooks and handover information. Agree recurring maintenance separately from additional development.
The proposal defines the scope and acceptance criteria for your project before work begins.
Start with the application, data, infrastructure and people who know the work.
Review backups, recovery and a test environment.
Agree priorities, acceptance checks and rollback conditions.
Document decisions and responsibilities for ongoing support.
Code quality, supported versions, test coverage, access, documentation and third-party dependencies determine the work. An initial assessment helps avoid estimating unknown repairs as if they were routine maintenance.
Bring the stack and versions if known, a list of recurring problems, ownership of repositories and hosting accounts, and the most important business workflows. You do not need every document ready to begin.
The foundation still fits
Fix risks, add documentation and tests, and make the existing system easier to support.
Some parts hold you back
Separate the changes, define connections to the existing system and verify each stage.
The business need has changed
Compare long-term costs and plan data migration and launch before committing to a replacement.
No. Maintaining the current application or changing selected components may be a better fit. We compare options against the business need and the condition of the system.
We first check ownership, access, documentation and contractual restrictions. A structured handover makes responsibilities and unknowns visible.
We can start with an assessment of the available code and environment. Investigation and documentation need to be included in the scope.
Daily operations
The servers, databases and platform the customer uses to do their work.
System improvements
Repairs and technology changes delivered in the relevant project stages.
Continuity
The scope, responsibilities and information a team needs to take over.
Maintaining a multi-site content platform while infrastructure and application improvements continue in separate stages.
Read the operations case study →Choose which cookies you allow. Learn more